On August 31, 2026, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced the emergency removal of 110 truck driving schools from FMCSA's Training Provider Registry — schools tied to more than 5,000 drivers cited for English-language proficiency violations. A separate 40-state investigation has produced 160-plus more notices of proposed removal, and FMCSA is now opening a nationwide audit of the third-party examiners who administer CDL skills tests. Drivers certified by the flagged providers are linked to 239 highway deaths. Here's what happened and why it matters for carrier vetting.
What the DOT Announced
Duffy made the announcement in Detroit, joined by Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, FMCSA Administrator Derek Barrs, federal prosecutors, and members of the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud. It was framed as one coordinated action with three moving parts:
110 emergency removals
FMCSA used its emergency authority to pull 110 Entry-Level Driver Training (ELDT) providers off the Training Provider Registry effective immediately. These schools are collectively associated with more than 5,000 drivers later cited for English-language proficiency (ELP) violations at roadside.
160+ notices of proposed removal
A separate sweep — 175 FMCSA investigators sent into 40 states in July 2026, conducting nearly 400 on-site investigations of training providers — produced more than 160 notices of proposed removal. Investigators documented inadequate space for required driving maneuvers, instructors without proper licensing, missing skills-assessment records, and in one case a school bus parked inside a trailer being passed off as a classroom.
Nationwide third-party tester audit
FMCSA will audit the state-authorized third-party examiners who administer CDL skills tests, plus the states responsible for overseeing them. Duffy said investigators had already found 10 individual third-party testers in a single state who together issued more than 2,000 CDLs to people who could not meet the English requirement.
The DOT says drivers certified by the providers now facing removal are linked to 239 commercial-motor-vehicle-related fatalities. Over the past 18 months, FMCSA has removed more than 8,000 training providers from the registry in total — the 110 emergency removals are the sharpest single action in that campaign.
How FMCSA Found the Schools
The 110 emergency removals came out of a data match, not field visits. Since June 25, 2025, failing to demonstrate English-language proficiency during a roadside inspection has been an out-of-service violation — a driver who can't read highway signs or respond to an officer in English is pulled off the road on the spot. More than 28,000 drivers have been placed out of service on that basis since the rule took effect, after the category recorded almost no violations in 2023 and 2024 combined.
FMCSA took the roadside records for those cited drivers and cross-referenced them against the Training Provider Registry to see which schools had certified them. Schools that showed up repeatedly — Barrs said every one of the 110 had passed at least 10 drivers subsequently cited for English violations — were flagged for emergency removal. The 160-plus proposed removals came from the separate physical-inspection sweep, where the problem was the training itself: no range, no qualified instructors, no records.
Where the Schools Are
The DOT released a partial state-by-state breakdown of the emergency removals. It covers 84 schools with a physical location across 20 states, plus 23 online-only providers — 107 in total. DOT has not published a complete list naming all 110 schools, so the last three aren't accounted for publicly. Four states make up more than 40% of the disclosed list:
Texas
13 schoolsTied for the most closures nationwide. Includes ASC Technical Institute, which certified 58 drivers later cited for English-proficiency violations.
Pennsylvania
13 schoolsTied with Texas for the largest number of emergency removals in a single state.
California
11 schoolsIncludes Platinum Plus Truck Driving School, whose trainees were tied to a fatal Oklahoma crash.
Florida
10 schoolsFourth-highest state total in the emergency-removal batch.
Utah
9 schoolsDisproportionately high given the state's size — a pattern FMCSA says points to volume CDL-mill activity.
Ohio
7 schoolsOhio is also the seat of the DOJ's new Joint Task Force Crossroads of America, focused on Midwest freight-corridor fraud.
New Jersey, New York, Wisconsin
3 schools eachNew Jersey's list includes Angel's Transportation, cited for running training in an undersized parking lot.
Arizona
2 schools10 more states
1 school eachColorado, Idaho, Maryland, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia, Washington, and West Virginia.
Online-only providers
23 schoolsRegistered with no physical training location. FMCSA treated the missing range and classroom facilities as disqualifying on their face.
The concentration in Texas, Pennsylvania, California, and Florida tracks freight volume and population — but Utah's nine closures and the 23 location-less online providers are the outliers FMCSA points to as evidence of schools built to move volume rather than train drivers.
The Schools Named — and the Crashes Behind Them
The DOT singled out three providers to illustrate the pattern:
Platinum Plus Truck Driving School (California)
Certified 36 drivers later cited for English-proficiency violations. One of its trainees was involved in a fatal crash in Oklahoma.
ASC Technical Institute (Texas)
Certified 58 drivers later cited for English-proficiency violations — the highest single-school count disclosed. One trainee was involved in a fatal stop-sign collision in Texas.
Angel's Transportation (New Jersey)
Facing proposed removal. Investigators found the school was conducting behind-the-wheel training in an undersized parking lot with no room for the maneuvers the skills test requires.
“Every single one of these schools passed at least 10 drivers subsequently cited for English violations,” Barrs said. Duffy put it more bluntly: “You have to speak English to operate a commercial motor vehicle.”
Next: The Third-Party Skills Tester Audit
The 110 schools are the visible part of the action. The nationwide audit of third-party CDL skills testers is the part with a longer tail.
Most states don't administer every CDL skills test themselves. They authorize third parties — training schools, employers, community colleges — to run the behind-the-wheel exam and report a pass or fail back to the state licensing agency. That's the point in the process where a driver who can't perform the maneuvers, or can't communicate in English, is supposed to be stopped. When a tester rubber-stamps results, the state issues a real, valid CDL on top of a test that never happened.
FMCSA now plans to review those testers and the state programs that oversee them. States with deficient oversight will be required to implement corrective action; the enforcement lever is federal highway funding — a state that doesn't comply can lose a percentage of its apportioned funds, escalating annually, and ultimately face decertification of its CDL program. States reported as early focus areas include California, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Virginia.
What ELDT and the Training Provider Registry Actually Are
The Entry-Level Driver Training rule has been in effect since February 7, 2022. Anyone getting a first CDL, upgrading from Class B to Class A, or adding a first passenger, school bus, or hazmat endorsement must complete training from a provider listed on FMCSA's Training Provider Registry before they're allowed to take the state CDL skills or knowledge test.
Providers self-certify that they meet the federal curriculum and facility standards to get listed. That self-certification model is what critics — including the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association — have long argued invites fraud: there's no pre-approval inspection, so a provider is on the registry until FMCSA has a reason to take it off.
Removal from the registry means the provider must immediately stop operating as a registered ELDT provider. Emergency removals take effect on notice, with an opportunity to respond afterward; proposed removals come with a window to contest before they're finalized. Certifications a provider issues after removal don't count toward the ELDT requirement.
Why This Matters for Freight Brokers
This is a driver-credential story, and brokers vet carriers, not individual drivers. But the exposure runs through the carrier.
A carrier that leans on CDL-mill schools tends to leave a data trail before any single driver's license becomes a problem. English-proficiency out-of-service events, failed inspections, and violations for basic vehicle operation show up in roadside inspection data and feed the carrier's Unsafe Driving and Driver Fitness BASIC scores. A carrier whose out-of-service rate is climbing, or whose inspection history is thin relative to its fleet size, is the one to ask questions about.
The liability logic is the same one from Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II: after a crash, the question is what the broker knew or should have known. A crackdown this heavily publicized — 110 named schools, a state-by-state list, 239 fatalities cited in a federal press conference — is squarely in the “should have known” column.
Watch out-of-service and inspection trends, not just the safety rating
Most carriers have no formal rating at all. A rising OOS rate or a spike in driver-related violations is a faster signal than waiting for FMCSA to schedule a compliance review.
Put driver-qualification representations in your carrier contract
The carrier should represent that its drivers hold valid CDLs and meet all federal driver-qualification requirements, including English-language proficiency. A carrier that signs that and dispatches an OOS-cited driver has breached the contract.
Re-check carriers you onboarded once and never revisited
The carriers most exposed to this are the ones vetted a year ago and never looked at since. Enforcement actions and BASIC scores both move between the onboarding check and the load.
Note carriers concentrated in the heavily affected states
Texas, Pennsylvania, California, Florida, and Utah account for most of the closed schools. That doesn't disqualify a carrier — but it's a reason to look harder at its inspection history during onboarding.
How This Fits the Broader Crackdown
The CDL-school action is one piece of an enforcement push that has been building since early 2025. It runs alongside the national non-domiciled CDL purge, in which FMCSA has ordered 26 states to void licenses issued outside the tightened rules; the English-language out-of-service order in effect since June 2025; and a Homeland Security Investigations sweep of more than 200 driving schools across 23 states. The Justice Department has stood up a Joint Task Force Crossroads of America — DOT, FMCSA, FBI, DEA, HSI, ICE, and ATF — targeting fraud along Midwest freight corridors.
Congress is moving too. “Dalilah's Law,” named for a child severely injured in a crash involving an unqualified driver, cleared the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee 35–26 and would write English-only CDL testing and tighter non-domiciled rules into statute rather than leaving them to executive guidance.
For brokers, the throughline is that driver-qualification failures are now a documented, public, actively enforced category of risk — not a background assumption. The carriers that pass a modern vetting process are the ones with a clean, consistent inspection record behind them.
Monitor your carriers for safety and compliance changes
FreightWatch tracks FMCSA authority status, out-of-service orders, inspection history, and BASIC scores for every carrier on your watchlist — and alerts you the moment something moves. Don't wait for a claim to find out a carrier's safety profile has slipped.
Sources: U.S. DOT / FMCSA announcement, August 31, 2026 (Detroit), and FMCSA Training Provider Registry / Entry-Level Driver Training program materials (fmcsa.dot.gov). Reporting: FreightWaves, "DOT shuts down 110 truck driving schools in CDL fraud crackdown" and "Texas, Pennsylvania lead states in CDL school shutdowns"; Overdrive, "FMCSA shuts down 110 CDL schools in major crackdown"; Transport Topics, "Duffy closes 110 CDL schools, plans audit of CDL testers"; Commercial Carrier Journal, "Feds shut down 110 CDL schools in trucking fraud roundup" and "Texas and Pennsylvania lead nation in DOT CDL school shutdowns"; Heavy Duty Trucking, "FMCSA removes 110 truck driver training schools from certified ELDT list"; CDLLife, "USDOT shuts down 110 CDL schools for English proficiency violations". English-language out-of-service background: Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance, ELP out-of-service criteria effective June 25, 2025. "Dalilah's Law" status: Land Line and CCJ committee coverage. The state-by-state figures are DOT's published breakdown, which totals 107 of the 110 removals; DOT has not released a full list naming every school.